Video Review on Anti-Martingale Money Management System

9

Many traders already know well the capital management according to the Martingale method. It is also known for its high profitability and inevitable loss of the entire deposit at the same time. However, there is an opposite method of money management, which the traders call the Anti-Martingale method. In this article, we are going to discuss it in details and find out which “break-even” system is better.

Before reading the article and writing your questions in comments section, I recommend to watch this video. It’s not long, but covers biggest part of questions on the topic.

ABOUT THE SYSTEM

This money management system (just like most of the “break-even” systems) was taken from the world of gambling, where they call it Parlay. Today nobody truly knows who first decided to turn the rules of the Martingale method. Although, it doesn’t really matter since it’s quite a simple thing to think about.

So instead of increasing the investment size after each loss, the traders need to double their rates after a profitable outcome. Thus, the Anti-Martingale system is safer than the original one but it also has lower profitability.

However, you should understand that the strategy still can bring you losses despite the risks are significantly decreased.

PRINCIPLES OF THE METHOD

The essence of the Anti-Martingale trading is very  simple:

  1. Set the size of the first investment.
  2. If the transaction happens to be loss-making, do not change the size of the next investment.
  3. If the option happens to be profitable, double the next investments until there is another money loss.

Let’s take a look at the example of the table with the profit of 80%:

Rate 10 20 10 20 10 20 40
Loss -20 -20
Profit 8 8 8 16 32
Total 8 -12 -4 -24 -16 0 32

The Anti-Martingale strategy differs in the fact that it does not go into such deep drawdowns as the usual Martingale strategy does. Of course, it is much easier to bear psychologically. However, in this case, a series of profitable transactions may last for a long time but sooner or later the last transaction (the largest one) will bring a big loss. The thing is that the total of the previous positions should be larger than the last option size.

PROFITABILITY OF THE METHOD

The original Anti-Martingale system is just not capable of making a profit, even if you have a very good ratio between profitable and loss-making options. Let’s exemplify this in comparison with the usual Martingale method:

martingale vs antimartingale strategies

This chart shows the curve of the capital balance changes in case of performing 200 transactions. It is obvious that the Parlay system steadily brings the deposit to the red despite 70% of transactions are profitable. The problem is the large size of the last transaction in the series, the loss of which covers all previous income.

You can easily avoid this situation. Do not double it each time but just increase it by the size of the first investment. Let’s take a look at how the profitability chart looks like in such case:

antimartingale risk management

The results are now much better. Take a look at the table to get a clearer view:

Rate 10 20 30 40 50 60 10
Loss -60
Profit 8 16 24 32 40 10
Total 8 24 48 80 120 60 70

 

THE RISKS

Now let’s see whether the Anti-Martingale method is good enough during drawdowns. We all know that the Martingale method will make you lose your deposit in case of a long period of the unprofitable transactions. It is of no doubt that the original Anti-Martingale system will also take away your deposit. However, let’s consider how things will be if you decide to increase the investment following the second way:

antimartingale strategy explained

If we take a look at the chart, we will see that the strategy shows good results in the long-term drawdown are. Instead of a sharp capital collapse (as it would happen in case of the usual Martingale strategy), the profitability curve has only slightly moved down.

SO WHICH STRATEGY IS BETTER?

You may often notice that the traders are disputing whether the Anti-Martingale or the usual Martingale strategy is better. If we talk about the original way to increase each subsequent transaction, then you should better use the classic Martingale strategy. However, if you increase transactions by the size of the first investment, then the Anti-Martingale strategy is safer and almost as profitable.

CONSLUSION

You should understand that the Anti-Martingale method is a way to improve profitability of your trading strategy. It can not be treated as a magic wand, which will bring you a profit at any ratio. If you trade “at random”, your deposit will cease to exist and it will only be a matter of time. Therefore, use this method only after you obtain a working and effective trading strategy.

9 COMMENTS

  1. nice. Anti-Martingale strategy. Never would have thought.This has inspired me. Thanks alot for the simple explanation!

  2. This strategy might work in SOME systems, but not in all of them, especially the ones when your betting is based on pure gambling.

  3. I’ve used this technique anti-martingale, and I’ve even sold out early because I saw that wasn’t going carry in direction I thought it would.

  4. I use martingale since 3 years but i do not multiply by 2 you need to do the math and you need back testing before adopting it

LEAVE A REPLY